ariana madix Have filed an “anti-SLAPP” motion to dismiss Rachel Lewis, revenge porn lawsuit against him and his ex, tom sandoval,
According to legal documents obtained by ET, the 38-year-old former bartender is asking a Los Angeles court to dismiss the February lawsuit filed by Lewis, 29, accusing him of creating revenge porn on Sandoval, 40, and Maddick. Was accused. , intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy.
In their new filing, Maddic’s legal team called Lewis’s case an example of a “SLAPP” lawsuit — a strategic lawsuit against public participation — and asked that all three claims filed against their client — the creation of revenge porn. , Harassment, emotional distress and invasion of privacy – be rejected. They are also asking that in accordance with the anti-SLAPP statute in California – the state where the case is based – Maddix’s attorneys’ fees should be paid by Lewis, saying their lawsuit is “an abuse of the legal process.”
A SLAPP lawsuit is defined as a legal action taken by a party that aims to “stop its critics from continuing negative publicity. By definition, SLAPP lawsuits do not have any actual legal claim against the critics,” According Cornell Law School, Maddix claims that Lewis, through her lawsuit, “seeks not to vindicate any cognizable right but rather to punish” and to prevent her and others “from exercising their constitutionally protected right of free speech “
Contrary to claims Lewis and his team have created In connection with the nature of her affair with Sandoval coming to light and Maddix’s knowledge of said affair, Maddix’s attorneys – Jordan Sussman and Margo Arnold – claim that she is not aware of the relationship between her then-partner and their I was completely in the dark. vanderpump rules Co-star.
“Ms. Maddix was not aware of this affair. But on March 1, 2023, Ms. Maddix found out about it in the worst possible way: by seeing a video of plaintiff and Mr. Sandoval’s phone sex on Mr. Sandoval’s phone, Maddix’s legal counsel alleges.
Maddix’s motion for discussion claims that although she was “devastated” upon making the discovery and informed her friends and coworkers about the situation, she did not receive explicit photographs of the relationship between Sandoval and Lewis, Did not participate in any illegal activity surrounding the video or evidence. While she was “devastated” upon making the discovery and informed her friends and coworkers about the situation, she did not participate in any illegal activity surrounding the explicit photos, videos, or evidence of the relationship between Sandoval and Lewis. Was.
“The one thing that Ms. Maddix did not do was share or show any video footage found on Mr. Sandoval’s phone with anyone other than Plaintiff. In fact, Ms. Maddix could not share such footage because Mr. Sandoval Susman & Arnold stated in a legal motion that Claimed.
The court has not yet ruled on Madix’s strike motion. The next court date is scheduled for July 11.
Maddix’s filing comes shortly after Sandoval’s own legal team claimed Lewis is attempting to portray Maddix as a “scorned woman” and the TomTom owner as “predatory.” In response, Sandoval also alleged that Lewis’s podcast, Rachel turns evilA strategic move to manipulate the narrative.
As for Lewis’s claim that Sandoval filmed their intimate FaceTime call, in which she appeared to be “undressed and masturbating” without his consent, Sandoval’s attorneys argue that the video allegedly were created and shared consensually and Sandoval saved only private copies. Video.
Sandoval is also requesting that Lewis’ lawsuit be either dismissed or amended.
Lewis’ attorneys, Mark Geragos and Brian Friedman, responded to Sandoval’s response, writing, “In the face of irrefutable evidence presented in court, Sandoval’s response is disturbing. His attempts to seek media attention and blame the victim are disturbing.” To resort to such claims is not only condemnable.” But actionable.”
vanderpump rules Airs Tuesdays at 8pm ET on Bravo.
Related Content:
ariana-madix-asks-court-to-dismiss-rachel-leviss-revenge-porn-lawsuit
